Global Warming is a Crock

January 29th, 2009

Now that I have your attention, read the following by meteorologist and Weather Channel founder John Coleman:

The key players are now all in place in Washington and in state governments across America to officially label carbon dioxide as a pollutant and enact laws that tax we citizens for our carbon footprints. Only two details stand in the way, the faltering economic times and a dramatic turn toward a colder climate. The last two bitter winters have lead to a rise in public awareness that CO2 is not a pollutant and is not a significant greenhouse gas that is triggering runaway global warming.

How did we ever get to this point where bad science is driving big government we have to struggle so to stop it? The key players are now all in place in Washington and in state governments across America to officially label carbon dioxide as a pollutant and enact laws that tax we citizens for our carbon footprints. Only two details stand in the way, the faltering economic times and a dramatic turn toward a colder climate. The last two bitter winters have lead to a rise in public awareness that CO2 is not a pollutant and is not a significant greenhouse gas that is triggering runaway global warming.

How did we ever get to this point where bad science is driving big government we have to struggle so to stop it?

We can thank in part the alarmist “global whiners”, including Al Gore; Coleman’s op-ed delves even deeper — going back to half a century.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

One Response to “Global Warming is a Crock”

  1. Ian Atkin on January 29, 2009 January 29, 2009 - 7:45 pm

    Sorry for being so blunt, but you’re a selfish fool if you really think that weaning ourselves off of hydro-carbons now is pointless.

    Even if all the climate change advocates in the world are dead wrong, there’s still something to be said for reducing our reliance on oil, and the pollution that it and its by-products create. This world needs to do this now before we realize it’s too late, and we find ourselves dealing with a socio-economic meltdown because the fuel is gone or too expensive to retrieve.

    The only argument for not doing so, and the reason for Bush’s reluctance to admit there’s a problem, is that of certain large corporations and their profit margins. The cost later will far exceed the potential cost now. Believe me.

Comments are closed.