<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Words Fail Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dcthornton.com/2005/01/08/yahoo-news-white-house-paid-commentator-to-promote-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dcthornton.com/2005/01/08/yahoo-news-white-house-paid-commentator-to-promote-law/</link>
	<description>traveling the road less traveled since 2001</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:09:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gisela Hausmann</title>
		<link>http://www.dcthornton.com/2005/01/08/yahoo-news-white-house-paid-commentator-to-promote-law/comment-page-1/#comment-2521</link>
		<dc:creator>Gisela Hausmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dcthornton.com/?p=1898#comment-2521</guid>
		<description>I am amazed that typical media reports about Armstrong Williams fail to mention the real point. While Armstrong Williamsâ€™ actions may have been foolish, and the Department of Educationâ€™s actions may have been illegal, the point is something else. 
I agree with the previous poster who asked if promoting NCLB wasnâ€™t really the Secretary of Educationâ€™s job. Yes, the DoEd came up with it, they should promote it, defend it, treat it like their product, and not pay somebody else. But, the real question in all of this ought to be: Why werenâ€™t these funds going toward some purpose designed to help students? Isnâ€™t that what taxpayer money is collected for? 

In December of 2004 the results of the PISA study 2003 were published. It was conducted by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development&#039;s Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), which tested 15-year old students from 39 countries.  U.S. studentsâ€™ math skills had dropped from #19 in 2000 to #28 in 2003. Now, U.S. studentsâ€™ math skills are listed as significantly below the OECD average. With the usual exceptions (NY Times, CSMonitor, Business Investorâ€™s Daily) not much was reported about this devastating result, which may or may not be due to the fact, that U.S. children actually scored better before NCLB was signed into law. 

Given the facts that the IT-industry is the only one which forecasts a 100% job-growth, that outsourcing is already a major problem for the U.S., and that mathematics is THE most important subject to prepare students for any career in the IT industry, this PISA study result is a devastating problem. U.S. students were outscored by students from 27 countries including Poland, Hungary, and Latvia, and not only the usual top scorers from Asian countries. Rod Paige called this situation a â€œblinking red lightâ€�, I think it presents a dangerous situation for the future of the country (If in the future more well-paying jobs will get outsourced, whose taxes will pay for ... whatever?). Personally, I believe that these famous funds should have been used for a publicity campaign informing U.S. parents that they will have to engage into their childrenâ€™s math education or their children might not be able to get a well-paying job in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am amazed that typical media reports about Armstrong Williams fail to mention the real point. While Armstrong Williamsâ€™ actions may have been foolish, and the Department of Educationâ€™s actions may have been illegal, the point is something else.<br />
I agree with the previous poster who asked if promoting NCLB wasnâ€™t really the Secretary of Educationâ€™s job. Yes, the DoEd came up with it, they should promote it, defend it, treat it like their product, and not pay somebody else. But, the real question in all of this ought to be: Why werenâ€™t these funds going toward some purpose designed to help students? Isnâ€™t that what taxpayer money is collected for? </p>
<p>In December of 2004 the results of the PISA study 2003 were published. It was conducted by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development&#8217;s Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), which tested 15-year old students from 39 countries.  U.S. studentsâ€™ math skills had dropped from #19 in 2000 to #28 in 2003. Now, U.S. studentsâ€™ math skills are listed as significantly below the OECD average. With the usual exceptions (NY Times, CSMonitor, Business Investorâ€™s Daily) not much was reported about this devastating result, which may or may not be due to the fact, that U.S. children actually scored better before NCLB was signed into law. </p>
<p>Given the facts that the IT-industry is the only one which forecasts a 100% job-growth, that outsourcing is already a major problem for the U.S., and that mathematics is THE most important subject to prepare students for any career in the IT industry, this PISA study result is a devastating problem. U.S. students were outscored by students from 27 countries including Poland, Hungary, and Latvia, and not only the usual top scorers from Asian countries. Rod Paige called this situation a â€œblinking red lightâ€�, I think it presents a dangerous situation for the future of the country (If in the future more well-paying jobs will get outsourced, whose taxes will pay for &#8230; whatever?). Personally, I believe that these famous funds should have been used for a publicity campaign informing U.S. parents that they will have to engage into their childrenâ€™s math education or their children might not be able to get a well-paying job in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramblings' Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.dcthornton.com/2005/01/08/yahoo-news-white-house-paid-commentator-to-promote-law/comment-page-1/#comment-2518</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramblings' Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dcthornton.com/?p=1898#comment-2518</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Williams-gate fallout: Armstrong apologizes&lt;/strong&gt;
Reaction to the Armstrong Williams-Department of Education scandal was swift and furious over the weekend, as I wasn&#039;t the only one to make a lot of noise on the issue (LaShawn Barber, Michelle Malkin, Rob Bernard, DC Thornton, Amy Ridenour,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Williams-gate fallout: Armstrong apologizes</strong><br />
Reaction to the Armstrong Williams-Department of Education scandal was swift and furious over the weekend, as I wasn&#8217;t the only one to make a lot of noise on the issue (LaShawn Barber, Michelle Malkin, Rob Bernard, DC Thornton, Amy Ridenour,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cincinnati Black Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.dcthornton.com/2005/01/08/yahoo-news-white-house-paid-commentator-to-promote-law/comment-page-1/#comment-2517</link>
		<dc:creator>Cincinnati Black Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dcthornton.com/?p=1898#comment-2517</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Armstrong Williams On The Wrong Side&lt;/strong&gt;
I  don&#039;t want to see Armstrong Williams go to jail for violating the Antideficiency Act, the federal &quot;Publicity and Propaganda&quot; laws, or the Federal Communications Act, but I would like to see the FCC come down with strict rules either requiring ful...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Armstrong Williams On The Wrong Side</strong><br />
I  don&#8217;t want to see Armstrong Williams go to jail for violating the Antideficiency Act, the federal &#8220;Publicity and Propaganda&#8221; laws, or the Federal Communications Act, but I would like to see the FCC come down with strict rules either requiring ful&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

